Wednesday, February 3, 2010

PART 2 - Root Problem Or Fruit Problem?

(So, it's been a couple weeks since my last post, but I've been busy with another creative project that has had my full attention... but now, we're back, folks!)
ALL RIGHT! Let's get back into it!

There were some great comments on the last post (Is It A Root Problem Or A Fruit Problem?), and I think some of the thoughts expressed by others warrant another entry on this subject.

Let's explore the idea that, when looking at our cultural Root and Fruit Problems, we might just be dealing with an issue of "BOTH/AND", not necessarily, "EITHER/OR".

I'm not saying that we must be EITHER/OR when it comes to EITHER Personal Evangelism OR Social Reform. The focus of the Body of Christ should definitely be BOTH personal evangelism AND social reform, but what I'm saying is that we should prioritize our BOTH as well as our AND.

My point is that one naturally follows the other.

One of the commentors (Karen, love your thoughts!) from the last entry pointed out that "[she has] recently received some very thorough Biblical teaching on the Reformer’s Creed that leads [her] to believe we must do both at the same time. [my emphasis added]." (by the by, Karen, I've read that book too... it's quite good! And, the author is one of my personal favorites. HaHa!... I fully recommend it to anyone who wants to read THE REFORMER'S CREED.)

However, we're not talking about Personal Evangelism as merely getting people to have a "salvation experience." Certainly, Personal Evangelism is more than walkin' that aisle and sayin' that prayer... that would be naive and short-sighted to think that ye ole sinner's prayer (ie: just get their ticket punched) is a sufficient form of Personal Evangelism.

The Personal Evangelism promoted through the New Testament involves relationship, ministry, service to each other, discipleship, and training. It is being intimately involved in the lives of others, pointing them toward a Christ-centered, Spirit-driven relationship with the Father! It involves transforming lives so that one can be truly FREE, in the Biblical sense of the word, not in the American sense of democratic LIBERTY.

So back to the BOTH/AND.
Like I said above: one naturally follows the other.

True Personal Evangelism and discipleship will change a culture from the Bottom - Up. It starts at the lowest point of the culture, the individual. Personal Evangelism transforms individual lives, one by one, person to person. And when the individual people of a culture are transformed, then it naturally follows that the culture will be transformed. That's my point.

To restate what I said in the last post, "we are focused on the wrong thing if we think that the laws on the books will change people's hearts. Rather, we should focus on changing people's hearts first. Then, we will see the laws reflect the morality of the people."

And, the growth of Christianity through Personal Evangelism cannot be stopped, no matter what the natural governing authorities do to quell it.

Case in point: even as an outlawed minority, Christianity grew exponentially under the repressive hand of the Roman Empire, and not because Christians were a special interest lobby group in the Roman Senate. No! As Tertullian said, "the blood of the martyrs was the seed of the Church." The Church exploded in growth when it was persecuted - not when it was the State's officially-recognized, TopDown religious authority.

As a matter of fact, wasn't it around the time that Christianity became institutionalized by Constantine and when the "Church" became the leading political force that Europe entered a period commonly called, The Dark Ages... ??? (Sure, it can be argued that there had to be a period of deconstruction to wipe away the last vestiges of Roman dominance, but it is compelling to think that TopDown-politically-driven-Christianity was the major ruling force during that era.)

But I digress... my point is that, as Christians, our MAIN focus should be on reaching out to and discipling individual people rather than becoming a dominant political force. After all, what difference does our democractic system make to the souls of those who enter into Eternity separated from God?

Obviously, this topic is epic in scope, and I can barely touch on all the various sides of the argument in one blog entry, and I've already gone long enough on this one. So, perhaps we will have to continue on this topic some more later.

As always, I welcome any thoughts, comments, questions, suggestions, recommendations, etc. I even welcome you to say, "Dallas, you're crazy! What would your parents say?"
Much love to you all!

2 comments:

  1. It’s an interesting discussion. Thanks for keeping it going. I understand the roots/fruit connection that you’re making. It makes sense. Do you think there is a danger that if the analogy is taken too far it might lead some people to the conclusion that the great commission is merely a means to the ultimate goal of political or social reform? I don’t think that’s what you’re saying. But, maybe it’s a potential risk with your analogy. All analogies come with the risk of misuse, which is OK so long as we understand their limitations. I think what you’re saying, which I agree with wholeheartedly, is that knowing God is the main issue, as well as being reconciled to Him and glorifying Him in all we do. Jesus’s Great Commission flows from this. Politics are not the main issue. Social reform is not the main issue. On the other hand, I find common ground with Karen's earlier comment to the extent she's saying we cannot ignore the things of the world, while we concentrate exclusively on making disciples. God raises up spokesmen to speak prophetically from a Biblical perspective about social issues in a way that glorifies Jesus. We should all exert our influence through the ballot box. But, if we attach either great hopes or fears to what is happening in the world, then that is a spiritual problem. It is a problem that develops, because we either do not understand the nature of God’s kingdom, or we do not understand that God is sovereign over everything.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am reminded how the people of God (and specifically the Pharisees) interpreted the messianic promise (Isa. 9:6-7) to mean that the Anointed One would be a mighty ruler that would defeat the enemies of his people and liberate them form Roman rule. It was this very expectation that blinded many, even Judas by certain accounts, from the nature of Christ’s rule and work in society. I wonder if we as faith community are not finding ourselves in the same place, expecting what ancient Israel expected. We as the anointed of the Lord (operating in the power of His Spirit) expect the Lord’s Body to be a mighty political leader, forgetting his example as servant leader. The issue might not be the either/or, or even the both/and, but the polity of leadership. We find leadership by majority vote easier than the leading by example. The one leader can simply ‘appear’ while the other must be sanctified. We change ourselves and invite others to participate in the same wonder that motivated us to change in the first place. Is social change not effective personal change with momentum? Twelve fishermen following the example of their servant king and eventually turned the Roman Empire on its head. Just a thought!

    ReplyDelete